Legal Opinion
Dittrich v. Ubl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 4, 1944No. 33,618PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Youngdahl, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a judgment determining that a building owned by him encroaches upon plaintiff’s land so as to constitute a trespass, and ordering such building removed.
Prior to March 15, 1937, defendant was the owner of lots 12 and 13, block 57, in the city of New Ulm. On that date he executed and delivered to plaintiff a warranty deed conveying lot 13 described in said deed as follows:
“Lot Number Thirteen (13) in Block No. Fifty-seven (57) South of Center Street in the City of New Ulm, Brown County, Minnesota, . according to the plat of said City on file and of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fox v. Union Sugar RefineryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- City of Racine v. EmersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Flynn v. GlennyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wood v. StarkoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Heitman v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Gilligan v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re Restoration to Capacity of MastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- United States v. James P. Doyle and Florence A. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.