Turnbull v. Schroeder
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Bam-sey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. cited, Bell v. Morse, 6 N. H. 205; Allen v. Kingsbury, 16 Pick. 235; Milling v. Granhfield, 1 McCord, 258; Pitts y. Brown, 49 Yt. 86; Glover y. Shields, 32 Barb. 374.
1Opinion of the CourtClare, J.
This is an action of ejectment. The plaintiff is the owner of lot 5, in block 1, of Irvine’s addition to St. Paul, as designated on the recorded plat thereof. The defendant is the owner of lots 8 and 9 in the same block. The following diagram represents the block, and the size and position of the lots in it, as shown by the plat:
*50
' The matter in controversy is the proper location of the line between lots 5 and 8.. The defendant is in possession to the line found by measuring .the width of lots 8 and 9, as marked on the plat, from the easterly line of the block, (which is an old,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hiner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Jackson ex dem. Livingston v. FreerNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Stanard v. EldridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Twogood v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Fleischfresser v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Andreu v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
- Dittrich v. UblSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Carlyle v. SloanOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Neill v. HakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Borer v. LangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.