Legal Opinion

A. Paul Goodall Real Estate & Ins. v. North Birmingham American Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1932No. 6 Div. 182PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN,. J.

This is an action On the common count for money had and received. The plea was the general issue.

The evidence is without dispute that the Peerless lee Cream Company, Inc., being indebted to the plaintiff in the sum 'Of $125, drew its check for the amount of the indebtedness on .the defendant bank with which the drawer was a depositor. ■ :

The check .was delivered to A. Paul Goodall, plaintiff’s agent, who had authority to receive the cheek as a collector, but had no authority to indorse plaintiff’s name thereon, or collect said check.

Goodall placed an indorsement thereon by using a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Allen v. M. Mendelsohn & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Shut & KeihnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Barnett v. Warren & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. M. Feitel House Wrecking Co. v. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Lindsley v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. RoyallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Tarrant American Savings Bank v. Smokeless Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API