Legal Opinion

Lindsley v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1937No. Appeal, 405PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The question at this time is whether plaintiff has stated a cause of action. A writ in assumpsit was issued to recover the aggregate of sixty-five checks payable to plaintiff’s order. They were drawn by various drawers on various banks other than defendant between June 25,1927, and December 12,1928, and were received by plaintiff in the course of business. Plaintiff’s signature was forged by a bookkeeper, Luke, who delivered the checks with the forged endorsements to Anna M. Kelly or Patrick Kelly, who deposited them in the defendant bank. The defendant collected…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Wen Kroy Realty Co. v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Hamlin v. . SearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Allen v. M. Mendelsohn & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Hamlin's Wizard Oil Co. v. United States Express Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Bank of Landisburg v. BurrussSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. DuPuy EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. MacKey-woodard, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API