Legal Opinion

Tarrant American Savings Bank v. Smokeless Fuel Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 7, 1937No. 6 Div. 1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The action was in trover.

The many counts of the complaint claimed damages for checks drawn to plaintiff, and which were alleged to be the property of the payee on the date of conversion.

The suit was by plaintiff, “suing for its own use and benefit and for the use and benefit of the American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, a body corporate.”

The judgment was for plaintiff for the aggregate amount of the many checks alleged to have been converted.

The suit was under section 9051 of the Code, which reads as follows: “Where a signature is forged or made without the authority of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Long v. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Aetna Ins. v. HannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Robertson Banking Co. v. BrasfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. National Surety Co. v. National City Bank of BrooklynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. Collins v. Mobile O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Standard Accident Insurance v. PellecchiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Kemp Motor Sales, Inc. v. LawrenzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. First National Bank v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API