Legal Opinion
Evans v. City of San Jose
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 2005No. H026802PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Elaine Evans appeals from a judgment in favor of the City of San Jose (the City) and the Redevelopment Agency of San Jose (the Agency), in which the trial court upheld a redevelopment plan adopted by the City. Her principal claim on appeal is that there was no substantial evidence in the record of the administrative proceedings to support the City’s findings of blight in the areas affected by the redevelopment plan, within the meaning of the statutory definition of blight. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33030, 33031.) She also contends that the trial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Porterville Citizens for Responsible Hillside Development v. City of PortervilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Planning & Conservation League v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Citizens for Open Government v. City of LodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.