Legal Opinion
Porterville Citizens for Responsible Hillside Development v. City of Porterville
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 2007No. F051953PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LEVY, Acting P. J.—
INTRODUCTION
Appellant and real party in interest Contour Development, Inc. (Contour), seeks to build a subdivision of 219 single-family homes (the housing project) on a hillside in the east side of the City of Porterville (City). Following preparation of an initial study, a mitigated negative declaration was prepared (the MND). After two public hearings, the city council passed a resolution adopting the MND and attached mitigation monitoring program, and a resolution approving the housing project’s tentative subdivision map (TSM).
Respondent and plaintiff Porterville…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Sacramento Old City Ass'n v. City Council of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Sierra Club v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Planning & Conservation League v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Preserve Poway v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Consolidated Irrigation District v. City of SelmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.