Legal Opinion
Letteau v. Dumas
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1929No. Docket No. 3775PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit to quiet title.
The plaintiff is the owner of the eight lots described in the complaint, which are a part of Tract 7603 of the city of Los Angeles. November 5, 1923, the defendants prepared and sent to the plaintiff a written communication in the form of a tentative agreement or offer to buy these eight lots upon specified terms for the sum of $28,500. This agreement was accompanied by $7,050 as part payment. The document described them with reference to an unrecorded map. So far as the record shows, the plaintiff had nothing to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- White v. JacobsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Krause v. Marine Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hartzell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- Goodspeed v. Associated Almond Growers of Paso RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Cook v. La Vina Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Harris & Hull, Inc. v. McCarty-Vaughan-Evans Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Kozlowski v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd Brasileiro v. David G. Evans Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.