Legal Opinion

Kozlowski v. Adams

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1929No. Docket No. 3970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The complaint alleges that the defendant entered into an agreement with Rose Henderson, by the terms of which he agreed to sell and convey to her lot 84, tract 4754, in the city of Los Angeles, for $3,500; that he showed her a map of the tract and told her that it “was the official and recorded map of said tract”; that thereafter Rose Henderson transferred all her rights under the contract to the plaintiff; that the plaintiff has paid the defendant on the purchase price of the lot the sum of $2,500; that the defendant thereafter informed the plaintiff that he would not convey the lot to her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. White v. JacobsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Krause v. Marine Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Longway v. NewberyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Hubbard v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Silverthorne v. PerceyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API