Legal Opinion

Hartzell v. Doolittle

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9071PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants. The defendant Doolittle alone has appealed, and filed a brief in support of his contention that the judgment is erroneous. No appearance herein has been made by the respondent, and we have not been favored by any brief or points and authorities in her behalf.

The sole contention of appellant is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the findings. Appellant makes a number of assignments as to the insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings. The first of these is that there is no evidence that “the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Cox v. Mountain Vistas, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Letteau v. DumasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Goodspeed v. Associated Almond Growers of Paso RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API