Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1923No. 17831PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— At the intersection of Third avenue and Wall street, in Seattle, the plaintiff was injured and his automobile wrecked by coming into collision with a street car. Plaintiff’s suit for damages was tried before a jury, and the defendant has appealed from a judgment against it.

The jury might have concluded the facts to be as follows: Third avenue runs northerly and southerly and intersects Wall street, which runs easterly and westerly; both streets being prominent thoroughfares. There is a double street car track on Third avenue. The respondent was driving westerly on Wall street, and thus…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Johnson v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wickman v. LundyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Johnson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Lee v. H. E. Gleason Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Dodge v. SalingerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Devlin v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API