MacDonald v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
— At the intersection of Third avenue and Wall street, in Seattle, the plaintiff was injured and his automobile wrecked by coming into collision with a street car. Plaintiff’s suit for damages was tried before a jury, and the defendant has appealed from a judgment against it.
The jury might have concluded the facts to be as follows: Third avenue runs northerly and southerly and intersects Wall street, which runs easterly and westerly; both streets being prominent thoroughfares. There is a double street car track on Third avenue. The respondent was driving westerly on Wall street, and thus…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Johnson v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Wickman v. LundyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Johnson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Lee v. H. E. Gleason Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Dodge v. SalingerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Devlin v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.