Carlisle v. Hargreaves
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered October 18, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff, Miss Carlisle, seeks recovery of damages which she claims to have suffered as the result of the negligent driving of an automobile by the defendant Mr. Hargreaves, in Seattle, which automobile was at the time owned by the community consisting of Mr. Hargreaves and his wife, and was then being driven by him for the community. Trial in the superior court for King county resulted in a verdict and judgment awarding to the plaintiff recovery in the sum of $1,000 against the defendants, from which they have appealed to this court.
Just prior to the time respondent, Miss Carlisle, was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conover v. Neher-Ross Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Dyke v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Wiles v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Stanley v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Watson v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson v. PlacanicaWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Johnson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Lunsford v. NealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970