Legal Opinion
Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Riley
California Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1926No. Docket No. Sac. 3924PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The petitioners herein apply to this court for the issuance of a writ of mandate to be directed to the defendant Ray L. Riley, as Controller, and to Charles G. Johnson, as Treasurer, of the state of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Argyle Dredging Co. v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Reclamation Board. v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Jefferson County v. Board of County & District Road IndebtednessTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- County of Los Angeles v. La FuenteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- County of Los Angeles v. RockholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.