Legal Opinion

Magayna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 1988No. Appeal, 124 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Edward Magayna (Petitioner) appeals an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referees decision to deny payment by Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation (Employer) of certain of Petitioners medical expenses and to deny assessment of penalties and counsel fees. We affirm in part and remand in part.

Petitioner suffered a work-related injury on January 31, 1975 while employed by Employer. As a result of Petitioners injury, he received medical treatment from various physicians and hospitals. Petitioner thereafter sought payment from Employer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Marcks v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Penczkowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Sokol v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Majesky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Loose v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Pistella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Laird v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Dworek v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API