Sullivan v. State Board of Control
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
In this appeal we determine that a writ of mandate (Code of Civ. Proc., § 1085) does not lie (1) to compel the California Highway Patrol (CHP) to refrain from ordering its officers to appear as witnesses in court absent service upon the officers of a lawful subpoena or (2) to compel the state or county government to compensatexifficers of the CHP for time spent on standby status as peace officer witnesses. We conclude that plaintiffs, who are CHP officers, have adequate recourse in lieu of the extraordinary judicial remedy sought here through the collective bargaining…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Fire Fighters Union, Local 1186 v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Loder v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- California Association of Professional Scientists v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of Gilroy v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- California Ass'n of Highway Patrolmen v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Johnston v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.