Legal Opinion
California Ass'n of Highway Patrolmen v. Department of Personnel Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 9, 1986No. Civ. 25471PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Plaintiff California Association of Highway Patrolmen (CAHP) appeals from a judgment 1 sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend and denying a writ of mandate. CAHP sought to compel respondent, California Department of Personnel Administration (Department), to set aside its decision denying overtime compensation to officers employed by the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for the one-half hour lunch period of each working shift. 2 We shall affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background 3
In Fowler v. State Personnel Bd. (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 964 [185 Cal.Rptr. 292], the Court of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beck v. American Health Group International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Kulshrestha v. First Union Commercial Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Kreisher v. Mobil Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Metric Institutional Co-Investment Partners II v. Golden Eagle Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.