Legal Opinion
Electric Regulator Corp. v. Sterling Extruder Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 22, 1968No. Civ. 12031PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Chief Judge.
QUESTION PRESENTED
In this diversity contract action to recover the price of goods sold, defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., presents the question whether defendant, a foreign corporation, is amenable to service of process under Connecticut’s long-arm statute, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 33-411 (1962).
The Court holds that, although defendant did not transact business in Connecticut within the purview of Section 33-411(b), the cause of action arose out of contracts made in Connecticut within the purview of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. The Montreal Trust Company, and Tillie v. Lechtzier, Executors of the Estateof Isidor J. Klein, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Bernard Sirotta Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Simmons v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Koenig v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Cryomedics, Inc. v. Spembly, LimitedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
- Bross Utilities Service Corp. v. AboubshaitDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.