Legal Opinion

Koenig v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 7, 1980No. 571 and 572PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

These are consolidated appeals from orders sustaining appellee Boilermakers Local Lodge No. 5’s preliminary objections and dismissing appellants’ complaints for lack of jurisdiction, and also, in the alternative, on the ground of forum non conveniens.

Accepting as true, for the purposes of this inquiry, all well-pleaded facts, Frisch v. Alexson Equip. Corp., 423 Pa. 247, 224 A.2d 183 (1966), we may summarize appellants’ *563amended complaints 1 as follows. Appellants are New York residents, and at all times material to their cause of action were members in good standing of appellee,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Bowers v. NETI Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Beatrice Foods Co. v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Temtex Products, Inc. v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API