Legal Opinion
OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED v. County Qwick Print, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 4, 2010No. CV-10-110-B-WPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR, Chief District Judge.
The Court denies OfficeMax Incorporated’s (OfficeMax) motion for temporary restraining order, concluding that although a noncompetition agreement may be assigned with the consent of the employee to a successor business and may be assumed upon merger by another successor business, OfficeMax failed to establish that immediate enforcement of the agreement is necessary to avoid irreparable harm, that the balance of equities favors immediate injunctive relief, and that the public interest would benefit from…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Monroig-ZayasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Equifax Services, Inc., D/B/A Equifax Commercial Specialists F/k/a White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc. v. Steven A. HitzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harris v. WallDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016
- Officemax, Inc. v. LevesqueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Ginzburg v. Martínez-DávilaUnited States District Court · 2019
- Graham v. SabolDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Verso Paper Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.