Legal Opinion
Lorimer v. Fairchild
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 9, 1904No. 13,450PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from Reno district court; M. ,P. Simpson, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bukch, J.:
The facts of this controversy were found by the trial court to be as follows :
“1. That on the 23d day of July, 1886, the defendant William Stout executed a six-hundred- ($600) dollar note payable to William F. Leonard, a copy of which is attached to plaintiff’s petition, marked ‘ Exhibit A.’
“2. And that at the same time and for the purpose of securing said note said Stout executed a mortgage upon the southwest quarter of section twenty (20), in township twenty-six (26) south, of range nine (9) west, in Reno county, Kansas, a copy of which…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Washington Bridge Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MerrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Parmelee v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Powell v. United Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Maker v. TaftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Estes v. Edgar Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Petersime Incubator Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Deerfield State Bank v. CoerberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.