Legal Opinion

Lorimer v. Fairchild

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1904No. 13,450PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Reno district court; M. ,P. Simpson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bukch, J.:

The facts of this controversy were found by the trial court to be as follows :

“1. That on the 23d day of July, 1886, the defendant William Stout executed a six-hundred- ($600) dollar note payable to William F. Leonard, a copy of which is attached to plaintiff’s petition, marked ‘ Exhibit A.’
“2. And that at the same time and for the purpose of securing said note said Stout executed a mortgage upon the southwest quarter of section twenty (20), in township twenty-six (26) south, of range nine (9) west, in Reno county, Kansas, a copy of which…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Washington Bridge Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MerrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Parmelee v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Powell v. United Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Maker v. TaftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Estes v. Edgar Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Petersime Incubator Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Deerfield State Bank v. CoerberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API