City of Hastings v. Foxworthy
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Kearney county. Tried below before Beall, J. See opinion for reference to authorities.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
This was an action by Foxworthy against the city of Hastings to recover for personal injuries by him sustained through falling upon a sidewalk where it was alleged the *678city had permitted ice and snow to accumulate and remain. The case has acquired a long history. In its early course the district court overruled a demurrer to one count of the answer, and a judgment of dismissal having been entered, the plaintiff brought the case to this court, where the judgment of the district court was reversed. (Foxworthy v. City of Hastings, 23 Neb., 772.) The case was remanded to the district…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Clary v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Frankland v. CassadayTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Adams County v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Gohman v. City of St. BernardOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Zorrilla v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
- Touhey v. City of DecaturIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.