Legal Opinion

Deerfield State Bank v. Coerber

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1923No. 24,453PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

The Deerfield State Bank sued W. O. Coerber upon a note. In his answer he undertook to set out two defenses — an extension of time of payment and a cross-demand for damages for a wrongful attachment in the same action. A reply was filed consisting of a general denial. Upon the case being called for trial the plaintiff moved for judgment in its favor upon the pleadings. The motion was sustained and the defendant appeals.

The defendant pleaded that before he executed the note to the bank it promised that he should not be required to pay the *499indeb…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carver v. James Shelly & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Lorimer v. FairchildSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. State ex rel. Dawson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Robertson v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. First National Bank v. StaabSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allison v. BorerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Root Grain Co. v. LivengoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. FREEMAN v. TruittMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Petersime Incubator Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Andregg v. SparrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API