Legal Opinion

Maker v. Taft

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1914No. 2926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Brror from Superior Court, Custer County; J. W. Lazvter, Judge. Action in replevin by J. A. Maker against S. L>. Taft, Mary Taft, and-L. P. Taft. Judgment was for the defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This was an action in replevin commenced April 3, 1911, for the purpose of obtaining the possession of certain horses and cattle described in a chattel mortgage given for the purpose of securing a promissory note for $582. The note being past due, the mortgagee sought the possession of the property in order that he might foreclose the same. The order of replevin was issued, and the property seized and sold after posting notice the required time, and the proceeds of the sale applied in payment of the amount of the note and interest and costs, and a small balance of $36…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Olmstead v. . LatimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Jenness v. CutlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Parmelee v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Gibson v. IrbyTexas Supreme Court · 1856

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arthur L. Black v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc., a Division of Baker Hughes, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Stetler v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Adams v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Harris v. MorgensenWashington Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API