Legal Opinion

Benson v. Phipps

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1895No. 276PublishedCited by 99 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. The opinion gives a sufficient statement.

1Opinion of the Court

GAIHES, Chiee Justice.

The plaintiff was a surety for one Hosack, the principal maker upon a promissory note payable to the defendant in error. Some days after the note fell due, Hosack wrote defendant' in’error requesting an extension, to which request defendant replied by letter as follows: “I will extend the time of payment one year, and look with confidence for the accrued interest within sixty days, hoping it will not inconvenience you. After that, if it is your pleasure to make the interest on the extension payable semi-annually, it will help me.”.

The defendant in error testified to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McLemore v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Crossman v. WohllebenIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Gibson v. IrbyTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Claiborne v. BirgeTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Stallings v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. San Antonio Real Estate Building & Loan Ass'n v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ward v. ScarboroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Fanning v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Tsesmelis v. Sinton State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API