Legal Opinion
Diomede v. Lowe
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 4, 1937No. 138PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Nicholas Diomede, employed by the appellant Moran Bros. Contracting Company, Inc., for fifteen years, was in charge of a dump scow known as the Moran No. 18. This scow was used to transport ashes, mud, and refuse from piers within the harbor of New York to the dumping grounds beyond the harbor limits, and, being without means of self-propulsion, was towed by tugs of the Moran Company. The scow was equipped with a cabin used by the decedent, who was required to remain on board at all times except when special permission was granted. His pay was $1 a day and extra…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- De Wald v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norton v. Warner Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Carumbo v. Cape Cod S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Karl Weiss, Jr. v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.