Legal Opinion

Karl Weiss, Jr. v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 26, 1956No. 13-1613PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action for negligence under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, and maintenance and cure under the general maritime law. The court sub-rnitted the count upon the Jones Act to a jury, which returned a verdict for defendant. At plaintiff’s request the judge then considered the count for maintenance and cure and granted judgment for plaintiff for $5,000 and costs.1 Defendant has appealed on the ground that >laintiff was not a seaman.

Defendant operates ferryboats crossing the Hudson River between Jersey City, New Jersey, and Liberty Street, New York City.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gypsum Carrier, Inc. v. William D. HandelsmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Anna Mahramas v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., and House of Albert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API