Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanchez

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 13, 1928No. 3001PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

This is an appeal in a reappraisement matter. The facts, as shown by the record, are these:

In the year 1923 the city of San Juan, in Porto Rico, proposed to install an aqueduct and for that purpose received and opened, on August 15, bids for certain cast-iron pipe and fittings therefor. Enrique Vidal Sanchez, the appellee, was considered the successful bidder and was awarded the contract to furnish said pipe and fittings, this contract being executed by appellee and the city on August 25, 1923. The amount of material to be furnished under this contract and a supplementary contract was quite…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RichardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Batten & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. SeChrist v. BryantDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
  5. Dundee Petroleum Co. v. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Shannon Luminous Material Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. International Hat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Union Fork & Hoe Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  5. United States v. Wool Novelty Co.United States Customs Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API