Legal Opinion

Cox v. Hart

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1892No. 828PublishedCited by 32 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hablan

This was an action of trespass.to try the title to certain lands in McLennan County, Texas, the boundaries of which are fully given in the pleadings and in the judgment. They are also described generally as “ being the same tract of land patented by the State of Texas to the heirs of James Stewart, on the 2d day of July, 1849, by patent No. 379, volume 5.”

On the 2d day of July, .1849, the State issued “ to the heirs of James Stewart, deceased, their heirs and assigns,” two patents, each for 960 acres of land, in McLennan County; patent “No. 379, vol. 5,” describing the land embraced.in it' as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. March v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Norris v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. White v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Keys v. MasonTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Pearson v. FlanaganTexas Supreme Court · 1879

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Rice v. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Cooke v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  5. Greenfield v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API