Legal Opinion
SeChrist v. Bryant
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 2, 1923No. 3782PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Acting Associate Justice.
Wallace Bryant, the defendant in error, filed on the 9th of November, 1921, a declaration in the municipal court of the District, complaining that the tenancy of prem*457ises rented by him to Ida M. SeChrist had been determined by default in the payment of the rent provided for in the agreement which established the tenancy, and that possession of the premises was withheld from him by her, notwithstanding a notice to quit in accordance with the agreement. On filing the declaration, a summons was issued commanding the plaintiff in error to appear and make answer on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harris v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Armour & Co. v. KollmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Davis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
3Cited by10 opinions
- Trans-Lux Radio City Corp. v. Service Parking Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- United States v. SanchezCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. McNair Realty Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1951
- Taylor v. Yellow Cab Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- United States v. FornessDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.