Legal Opinion

Shannon Luminous Material Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 20, 1972No. C.R.D. 72-21PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boe, Chief Judge:

In the instant case defendant has filed a Notice of Trial pursuant to rule 9.1(a) of the rules of this court requesting that trial of said action be held in New York City. The plaintiff, in its response thereto, has requested that trial foe held at Los Angeles, California, the port of entry of the merchandise in question. In support of its contention the plaintiff asserts that it has a “constitutional right” to a trial at the port of importation and urges that to require the plaintiff to try this action elsewhere would make a “mockery” of the right and guarantee with which it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  5. Frances Magnus, Administrator of the Estate of Leo Michalowski, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MizrahieUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  2. Simod America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  4. Turbon Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API