Antonio Aviles v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.
On original submission, this court held the trial court did not err in denying appellant Antonio Aviles’s motion to suppress the blood specimen drawn pursuant to section 724.012(b)(3)(B) of the Texas Transportation Code. Aviles v. State, 385 S.W.3d 110, 116 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2012), vacated, —— U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 902, 187 L.Ed.2d 767 (2014). Relying upon Beeman v. State, 86 S.W.3d 613, 616 (Tex.Crim.App.2002), we held section 724.012(b)(3)(B) permits a police officer to take a blood specimen from' DWI suspect without a warrant if the officer has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Wiede v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. Micah Abraham WulffIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.