Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1928No. Docket No. 6255PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff filed an action to recover the sum of $5,000 from defendant, such being the amount claimed to be owing on two policies of fire insurance. Defendant appeared and filed an answer. On June 5, 1922, the cause came on for trial, at which time plaintiff and defendant entered into a stipulation as follows: “It is hereby stipulated that the above entitled action be and the same is compromised as follows: that plaintiff shall have judgment for the sum of $2,200.00, lawful money of the United States without costs; that execution on the whole of said judgment shall be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glenn v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Durbin v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Takekawa v. HoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Howdershell v. HowdershellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Benning v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Milicevich v. Sacramento Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Rabinowitch v. Cal. Western Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Sherard v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People Ex Rel. Mosk v. BarenfeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. John Siebel Associates v. KeeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API