John Siebel Associates v. Keele
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
A judgment debtor seeks to partially vacate a judgment entered pursuant to stipulation on the ground that it is void because it provides for an interest rate greater than the rate set by the Constitution. The first question before us is whether a stipulated judgment may carry a 15 percent interest rate. We find that it may not. We must also determine whether the stipulated judgment in this case was enforceable and, therefore, subject to the constitutional interest rate at the time it was entered. We find that the judgment was qualified when first entered and not subject to the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hilton v. McNittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Watson v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Boerner v. Colwell Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Reifler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mendly v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Consolidated American Insurance Company v. Mike Soper Marine ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Marriage of BenjaminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Gassner v. Stasa, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bisno v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.