Benning v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate originally made to the District Court'of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to compel the Superior Court to set aside an order settling a final account and decree of distribution. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This is a petition for writ of mandate to compel the superior court in and for the county of Sacramento and the judge thereof to set aside an order settling the final account of the administrator and decree of distribution in the matter of the estate of Manuel S. Nevis, deceased.
Petitioner is the assignee of Charles Peterson, a creditor of said estate. Peterson duly presented his claim, which was allowed by the administrator and the judge of the superior court for $992. Thereafter the administrator paid petitioner $607.61, leaving a balance of $331.13. Thereafter, and upon the fifteenth day…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Smith v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grinbaum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- King v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. SandbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re the Estate of ParsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Okfuskey v. CorbinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.