Legal Opinion

Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. Taseski

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 26, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-40411PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF I COUNTER-DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

This is a case involving the turbulent relationship between a franchisor, plain tiff/counter-defendant Dunkin’ Donuts Incorporated (hereinafter plaintiff “Dunkin’ Donuts”), and its franchisees, defendants/counter-plaintiffs Trpko Taseski, Bosko Taseski, and TRBO Corporation (hereinafter “defendants”). Presently before the Court is plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on all remaining counts in its first amended complaint and on defendants’ counterclaims, filed February 25,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Missouri Board of Nursing AdministratorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Gregury, J. v. Greguras, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Deakins v. PackDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2013
  4. Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. Gav-Stra Donuts, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  5. United States v. HansenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API