Legal Opinion
United States v. Hansen
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 28, 2005No. 05CV921-L(NLS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL
STORMES, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before this Court is the Motion of United States of America (“Plaintiff’) to Compel Appearance at Deposition of Defendant Christopher M. Hansen (“Defendant”). [Dkt. No. 34, 35.] Defendant has filed an Opposition to the Motion. [Dkt. No. 37, 38.] Plaintiff has filed a Reply in support of its Motion. [Dkt. No. 40.] The Court finds the issues appropriate for a decision on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons explained below, the Motion to Compel is GRANTED.
Background
Defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,322 Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., William H. HowtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Evenstar Master Sub-Fund I Segregated PortfolioDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Raiser v. San Diego CountyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Strickland v. City of AuburnDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Sundby v. Marquee Funding Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020