Legal Opinion

Wheelock v. Eyl

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1974No. 8 March Term 1974, Docket No. 54,654PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. G. Kavanagh, J.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the granting of a motion for new trial in an automobile negligence case. Defendants-appellants raise the evidentiary question of whether the bare payment of a traffic ticket fine for a violation involving conduct subsequently at issue in a civil case may be admitted as evidence of negligence in that case. We reverse the trial *76court’s grant of a new trial and hold that neither bare payments of fines nor guilty pleas may be admitted as evidence in a civil trial for the purpose of showing that substantially the same wrongful conduct at issue in the civil…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Cebulak v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Zimmerman v. GoldbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. TomlinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Diamond v. HolsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Salorio v. GlaserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. Williams v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Waknin v. ChamberlainMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API