Walsh v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Sacramento County and Charles 0. Busiek, Judge thereof, to act upon and determine a motion for counsel fees and costs. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On August 16, 1919, petitioner Leyla M. Walsh filed in the superior court of Sacramento County a complaint for a divorce against her husband, Earnest E. Walsh. On September 16th the defendant appeared in the action and filed a general demurrer to the complaint, a demand for a change of the place of trial, with an affidavit of merits and of his residence in the county of Butte. At the same time the defendant filed in the court a written instrument purporting to be a motion for said change of the place of trial, referring therein to the fact that said demand and affidavit were filed therewith,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Griffin & Skelly Co. v. Magnolia & Healdsburg Fruit Cannery Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Nolan v. McduffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hennessy v. NicolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Oakland v. DarbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Moore v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Morin v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Pickwick Stages System v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Beard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940