Legal Opinion

Beard v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1940No. Civ. 12620PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is an application (1) for a writ of prohibition to restrain respondent from enforcing an order requiring plaintiff to pay pendente lite to Camille Lucille Roberts a sum of money for the support of the alleged child of said Camille Lucille Roberts and petitioner, and (2) for an order directing respondent to hear and determine petitioner’s motion for a change of venue.

The essential facts are:

January 22, 1940, Camille Lucille Roberts filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Luis Obispo under the provisions of section 196a of the Civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nolan v. McduffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hennessy v. NicolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Pickwick Stages System v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Walsh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Oakland v. DarbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Gutierrez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Moore v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. County of Riverside v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Adams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API