Hennessy v. Nicol
California Supreme Court
Application in the Supreme Court for a writ of mandate to the judge of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an application for a writ of mandate commanding the respondent, as judge of the superior court of Tuolumne county, to hear and determine a motion made in an action pending in his court for a change of the place of trial of said action.
The facts upon which the application is based are as follows: On June 1, 1894, Cornelia Hennessy commenced an action in the superior court of Tuolumne county against John C. Hennessy, the petitioner here, alleging that the parties to the action were married on July 4, 1889, in said county, and had ever since been, and still were, husband and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Watts v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Watkins v. DegenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Oakland v. DarbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. HadleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Larson v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Beard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.