Legal Opinion

In Re Dedman

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1976No. S.F. 23396PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

17 Cal.3d 229 (1976)

550 P.2d 1040

130 Cal. Rptr. 504

In re FRANK WILLIAM DEDMAN, JR., on Suspension.

Docket No. S.F. 23396.

Supreme Court of California.

June 22, 1976.

COUNSEL

Frank M. Brown for Petitioner.

Herbert M. Rosenthal for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for five years on conditions of probation which include actual suspension for three years.

Petitioner was admitted to practice in California on December 23, 1966, and in September of 1968, he was a sole…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. In Re BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KumberaWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re NadrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re PossinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API