Legal Opinion

Wells v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1982No. 81-795PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Petitioner seeks review of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board’s denial of his claim for disability retirement. We find the Board’s decision to be supported by substantial evidence, and hereby affirm.

I

On April 24, 1978, petitioner, an officer with the Metropolitan Police Department (hereinafter “the Department”) was shot while on duty. He suffered a gunshot wound to his left arm and chest. The bullet lodged in his chest and was never removed. After the wound healed, petitioner was left with residual impairment in his nerve and muscle function.

Petitioner…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Seabolt v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Jones v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Woody v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Rzepecki v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wells v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Wells v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API