Seabolt v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge:
Petitioner Eugene Seabolt seeks review of a Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board decision denying him disability retirement. The Retirement Board found that petitioner was injured in the performance of duty under D.C.Code 1973, § 4-527, but concluded that he was not “disabled for useful and efficient [service] in the grade or class of position last occupied,” under D.C. Code 1973, § 4-521(2). We affirm.
On appeal, petitioner claims that “[t]he threshold issue presented ... is whether [he] is permanently disabled for the performance of his fire fighting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Jones v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Harrison v. J. H. Marshall & Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Torvik v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by22 opinions
- Proulx v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Martin v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wells v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Adgerson v. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- DiVincenzo v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.