Rzepecki v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Petitioner challenges respondent’s decision denying her request for disability retirement under D.C.Code 1973, §§ 4-526, -527. Finding substantial evidence in the record to support respondent’s determination, and no error of law having been committed, we affirm.
The Board found that petitioner, who presented evidence of a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, suffered “some limiting disability,” but concluded that she was not permanently disabled for useful and efficient service in the grade or class of position last occupied by her as a member of the United States Park Police.* See D.C.Code…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wells v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Woody v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Wells v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Martin v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.