Legal Opinion

Wells v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1983No. 81-795Published

1Opinion of the Court

459 A.2d 136 (1983)

Michael Emmett WELLS, Petitioner,

v.

POLICE AND FIREFIGHTER'S RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD, Respondent.

No. 81-795.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued En Banc January 10, 1983.

Decided April 6, 1983.

Gerald C. Baker, Lanham, Md., for petitioner.

Robert E. Deso, with whom Robert E. Greenberg, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for amicus curiae, Fraternal Order of Police, Metropolitan Police Dept. Labor Committee.

Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., and Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, and Diana M. Savit, Assistant Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C.,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Seabolt v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Jones v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Wells v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Woody v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API