Woody v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This case presents the question whether the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board made adequate findings, supported by substantial evidence of record, that petitioner is not disabled from per forming useful and efficient service in the Police Department. We affirm the Board’s decision.
I
On July 10, 1980, the Board of Police and Fire Surgeons recommended that petitioner, Joseph J. Woody, was permanently disabled for full duty as a police officer. Petitioner was presented to the Retirement and Relief Board for consideration on August 14, 1980. At this hearing, Dr. Joseph Chapman…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neer v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rzepecki v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Whitehurst v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by11 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wells v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cocome v. District of Columbia Lottery & Charitable Games Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- District of Columbia General Hospital v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Walsh v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.