Legal Opinion
Aguayo v. U.S. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2011No. 09-56679PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZOUHARY, District Judge:
Introduction
Jose Aguayo (“Aguayo”) appeals the district court’s grant of Defendant U.S. Bank N.A.’s (“U.S. Bank”) motion to dismiss. Aguayo claims U.S. Bank violated a sec tion of California’s Rees-Levering Act that requires a car loan lender to provide certain post-repossession notices to a defaulting borrower prior to selling the repossessed car. If the lender fails to provide the required notices, the lender is barred from collecting any remaining deficiency after the car is sold. Aguayo argues that because the notices he received from U.S. Bank did not…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Katz v. Pershing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Veronica Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Tritz v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Donald Lusnak v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Epps v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.