Legal Opinion
Tritz v. United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 9, 2013No. 10-56967PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we consider whether the Tucker Act grants exclusive jurisdiction to the Court of Federal Claims to hear contract claims against the United States Postal Service (“Postal Service”) seeking more than $10,000 in damages. We conclude that the Tucker Act’s grant of jurisdiction to the Court of Federal Claims to hear such claims is concurrent with the independent grant of jurisdiction to the United States district courts under the Postal Reorganization Act (“PRA”), 39 U.S.C. §§ 401 and 409. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of the action on…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Alan Metzgar v. KBR, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Joseph Cuviello v. City of VallejoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- ASSE International, Inc. v. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Roxann Franklin Mason v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Estate of Boyland v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.