Legal Opinion

May v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 12, 2008No. 07-726 LPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court are the United States’ Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Thereof (defendant’s Motion or Def.’s Mot.), Plaintiff, George May, Opposition to Defendant the United States of Americafs] Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Thereof, and Memorandum in Support Thereof, and Request for the Relief Requested in Plaintiff, George May, Complaint, or for Alternative Dispute Resolution (plaintiffs Response or Pl.’s Resp.)1, and the United *443States’ Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (defendant’s Reply or Def.’s Reply.).

1. Background

Pro se plaintiff…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Clifton v. Village of BlanchesterOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. RhinoCorps Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Kemp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Cycenas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API