Legal Opinion
Kemp v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 20, 2015No. 15-457CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff: Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Proper Defendants; Unlawful Confinement; Admiralty.
ORDER
HORN, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Pro se plaintiff ‘William-Frederick: Kemp, Jr” filed a complaint with the United States Court of Federal Claims without naming the United States as a defendant, which was accepted for filing by the Clerk’s Office. It is questionable whether' the Clerk’s Office should have filed plaintiffs submission as a complaint'under the minimum standards for filing a complaint pursuant to the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) (2015). Nonetheless,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Broughton v. Truist BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Broughton v. V.W. Credit VolkswagonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Gulley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Maldonado v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Perry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.